Strategii: "Financial
Communications Attract Foreign Investments"
Myron Wasylyk, Senior Vice President and Managing
Director, The PBN Company Oksana Monastyrska, Senior
Account Manager, The PBN Company
Financial communications has become one of the most
dynamically developing fields of modern Public
Relations. New technologies have changed the nature of
business, making it more open and accessible to the
public. The Internet, for example, allows a company to
contact a potential customer offering a wide array of
services, including financial services, promptly and on
a global scale. There is a direct relationship between
corporate PR and financial PR.
Corporate PR is understood as forming and managing a
company's reputation, while business/corporate
reputation remains an illusion without the financial
reliability and investment attractiveness of a company.
As a rule, a company's corporate image consists of the
following factors: meeting customer/client needs in
terms of the quality of services and meeting investors'
needs in terms of the management system and financial
performance. It should be noted that corporate
reputation is the foundation for the successful
development of financial communications. The quality and
related reputation of a company's services or goods are
not separated from the corporate image by institutional
and private investors, investment analysts and
journalists.
|
Advice to the Ukrainian CEO |
- Reputations are earned, not
bought.
- Deal-driven or crisis-driven
focus on reputation is costly & ineffective.
- Be as professional about
managing your reputation as managing cash flow,
growth and profits.
- The CEO's good reputation is
essential to the company's good reputation.
|
Programs in the field of financial communications
envisage developing a strategy, organizing and holding
public informational and analytical events with a view
to establishing and cultivating efficient links between
the management of a company and its target audiences:
both domestic (internal) and foreign (external).
Internal Target Audiences
- Shareholders (employees)
- Major shareholders (banks and others)
- Government
- Local authorities
- Investment funds
- Mass media
External Target Audiences
- Institutional investors, investment fund managers
and financial analysts
- Investment banks and brokerage firms (financial
analysts and brokers)
- Mass media (leading international financial and
industry editions, international information agencies)
To successfully implement a financial communications
program, it is essential that all target audiences
obtain a sufficient amount of information about the
company's activities. It is critical that the delivery
of information to shareholders, investors, analysts, and
specialized mass media remains specific in terms of the
type of information. Moreover, large institutional
investors may seem overwhelming to companies that have
no previous experience working with them. Therefore,
there is immense risk in spending the time and effort to
build a relationship with a person who might not have
the authority to make investment decisions. Lack of
information simply prevents target audiences from
evaluating economic benefits of suggested initiatives
and sometimes gives rise to discontent that may lead a
company into crisis.
The tasks usually encompassed by financial
communications include the coverage of privatization
processes, takeovers and mergers, restructuring,
additional issuance of securities, clarification of
legal initiatives which may relate to ownership
structure or management of a company, corporate
governance issues (i.e. shareholders' meetings, disputes
between shareholders in respect to holdings of
securities, preparation of annual reports, etc.). The
combination of efforts of the company's management,
legal advisors, auditors, financial consultants, and
experts in the field of strategic communications is a
prerequisite for the successful fulfillment of the
aforesaid tasks. Obviously, all this activity should be
carried out within the framework of a unified
program.
The basic requirements for companies or experts
involved in strategic communications are to present
information in a timely and correct manner, track
feedback, and adjust perceptions of key messages by
target audiences. To this end, it is extremely important
to gain insight into specific features of the client's
business and into financial, economic, and legal aspects
of its activities. Correctly choosing the form of
communication between a company and a target audience
will guarantee a positive outcome. For instance, it is
more common for foreign investors to obtain information
about the company from the Internet and to communicate
via the Internet.
|
Corporate Reputation
Influencers |
| |
US
CEOs |
| Broadcast Media |
2.53 |
| Internet |
2.7 |
| Government |
2.71 |
| Financial Analysts |
3.08 |
| Shareholders |
3.16 |
| Industry Analysts |
3.41 |
| Print Media |
3.44 |
| CEO Reputation |
4.28 |
| Employees |
4.42 |
| Customers |
4.82 |
|
Source: Hill &
Knowlton -2000 |
|
Rated by top
American CEOs & managers; 1=low,
5=high |
Any communications strategy or program begins with an
analysis of the situation and a study of prevailing
views. Clear answers to the following questions are
indispensable: What is the amount of information about
the company that is available to the target audiences?
What do they think about this company? What do they know
about the state of things in the company? Would they
like to become shareholders/partners/clients of this
company? Why or why not?
Answers to those questions form the basis for an
efficient communication strategy or program. If the
answers are correct and positive, then the communication
strategy is to help such answers/views establish
themselves more firmly. If the answers are negative,
then the communication strategy is to correct errors,
and if there are no views or answers at all, then the
communication strategy is to fill the void with key
messages before someone else fills that void.
Today, the boundaries for various types of
communications have become transparent and so-called
"internal communications" within one country have
practically ceased to exist. Ukrainian companies and
officials are constantly in the process of exchanging
information, regardless of whether they realize it or
not. Sometimes companies make the mistake of believing
that they deliver information only to their local
audiences. Information about a company reaches
investors, analysts, and mass media outside any
particular country. Unfortunately, it often happens that
the information that reaches foreign target audiences
was initially intended only for domestic target
audiences and, therefore, this information is
inefficient.
Successful implementation of a program related to
financial communications provides an opportunity to take
advantage of the situation and present the client's
history from his own standpoint. Efficient financial
communications are a strategic tool that, if used
correctly and with due experience, can help companies
and organizations to achieve their business
objectives.
Similar to legal advice or financial consultation,
which may help attain specific objectives,
communications also have their specific canons:
- The press, financial analysts, and observers do
not like an information void. If a company does not
tell about itself then someone else will do it
instead. Errors or false information must not be left
without response. One should identify the source of
erroneous understanding and rebut such information.
- Accessibility and readiness to train the press.
Bad news especially requires clarifications.
- Analysis and warning of a situation. Development
and differentiation of key messages.
For example, one company is in the process of taking
over another company. Both companies are located in
different countries. Undoubtedly, this news is "hot" for
many periodicals. In this case, an efficient matching of
interests of the company itself with interests of
specific groups through mass media rather than a wide
coverage of the event is required: commercial partners
expect changes in strategy, shareholders expect
guarantees against dilution of their capital due to the
purchase, employees expect changes in personnel
policies, etc.
Let us draw an example of a most remarkable project:
the 100% share purchase of Ukrainian Mobile
Communications (UMC) by Russia's Mobile TeleSystems
(MTS). The transaction occurred in two phases: during
the first phase (November 2002), the shares of UMC were
sold by three co-owners of the company: Ukrtelecom (25%
of shares), Deutsche Telekom, a German telecom operator
(16.3%), and Dutch KPN Telecom (16.3%). During the
second phase (April 2003), MTS purchased the remaining
42.3% of the shares of UMC. The sellers were represented
by two national telecom operators: TDC (Danish
shareholder of UMC) and Ukrtelecom. The first sold 16.3%
of its shares, while the second sold 26% of its shares.
This very complex transaction between five parties is
phenomenal. It is obvious that each of the shareholders
had its own views about the future of the joint venture.
Financial conditions and a diverse mentality among
shareholders should also be considered. However, the
fact that the transaction proved to be beneficial and
successful for all its parties and stakeholders,
including UMC subscribers, is even more surprising.
ING Barings was MTS's financial consultant in respect
to preparing for and concluding the transaction. In
addition, each of the participants hired its own
appraiser of UMC, and then the result obtained by each
party was reduced to a common denominator. For instance,
Raiffeisen Investment AG, an Austrian company, made the
appraisal for Ukrtelecom. MTS's program of financial
communications was fulfilled successfully by the
company's internal resources.
Analyzing articles, comments, and interviews
published in the local and foreign press in relation to
the transaction, one would clearly distinguish the basic
key message that the purchase of shares of UMC was
beneficial for all the participants and
stakeholders:
- Ukrtelecom's participation in the transaction
alongside with the worldwide telecom operators, shares
of which are quoted in world stock markets, will
produce a positive effect on Ukraine's investment
image.
- In terms of foreign investors, all of them
benefited from the sale of their shares. Title to
16.3% of shares did not allow KPN Telecom, TDC, and
Deutsche Telekom to implement their decisions, and the
sale of each of those three shareholdings was a
super-beneficial way out of an uncontrollable
business.
- For UMC, the change in the owner is good, as MTS
will provide the Ukrainian partner with access to
world financial markets (shares of MTS have been
quoted on the New York Stock Exchange since June
2000).
- With its new shareholder, UMC will be able to
offer reasonable roaming rates throughout Russia and
various new services to subscribers.
The market for financial communications in Ukraine
currently remains narrow. However, more and more local
companies are engaging in an open and confident dialogue
with foreign investors and creditors. Many companies
understand not only the cost of capital or comparative
advantages from loans and shares but also use modern
methods of financial management. Under these conditions,
a company's internal resources may not always be
sufficient for work with domestic and foreign investors,
creditors, potential shareholders, and stock analysts.
Therefore, the Ukrainian market will see an increased
demand for financial communications services in the near
future.
Email Myron or Oksana: myron.wasylyk@pbnco.com,
oksana.monastyrska@pbnco.com
Read the original article in Ukrainian, as published
in Strategii #10, October 2003: http://www.strategy.com.ua/strategy/article.aspx?column=6&article=253
|